Symbiotic Living with Nature


We have been living in a crisis of erasure, oppression, and destruction of Nature, since the feudal systems of Europe dating back to the 5th century where Land was only for a ruling class and was meant for profit, leaving little consideration for the health of Land. This in turn exhausted the soil and the people that worked the land, making them vulnerable to disease.

In other words, the spread of feudalism ran in parallel to poor health outcomes and poor Planetary health.

Feudalism was then exchanged for capitalism which has taken a similar line and relationship to Nature.

For sixteen centuries Planet Earth has had to endure being owned, destroyed, and degraded.

The result is what we are living right now, the dysregulation of a wide range of Natural systems, including climate, food production, biodiversity, and microbiome.

It is important to understand that many Indigenous societies, who lived in kinship with Nature, resisted a feudal relationship with Nature.

They also continue to lead in the conservation of Nature to this day, protecting over 80% of the Planet’s biodiversity.

Therefore, Indigenous knowledge must be equitably platformed and listened to if we are to achieve Planetary and Human health.

 
 
 

Four Understandings


The problem is not climate change, the problem is the dysregulation of all Natural systems. Climate change is just one of the many consequences.

Therefore, the goal is not simply climate adaptation, the goal is to reframe, restructure, and heal our relationship with Nature.

Nature is our partner; therefore, we must turn to them for guidance and leadership rather than imposing a top down approach.

Our health is tied to Planetary health.


A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH NATURE

To address the four understandings we are proposing a symbiotic relationship with Nature. In everyday life, we tend to understand symbiosis as mutualism -- an interaction between two organisms, individuals, or groups where both organisms, individuals, or groups depend on and benefit from the interaction.

However, in biology, the term ‘symbiosis’ has a long history of debate about what it actually means and entails. In Greek, ‘symbiosis’ means ‘living together’. Although ‘living together’ does sound like a mutualistic relationship, there are, of course, non-mutualistic ways of living together, which are included in modern definitions of symbiosis. In biology, symbiosis refers to a long-term biological interaction between two organisms (or symbionts) from different species.

While this interaction can be mutualistic, two forms of non-mutualistic symbiosis are

  1. commensalism symbiosis (where one symbiont benefits without harming the other), and

  2. parasitic symbiosis (where one symbiont benefits while harming the other.

In biology, symbiosis, therefore, does not always refer to mutualism. Another distinction in the terminology is made when referring to so-called obligate and facultative symbiosis. Obligate symbiosis describes that the symbiosis is essential for the survival of at least one of the two symbionts, whereas facultative symbiosis describes that the symbiosis is not essential for either of the two symbionts.

In this report, we define symbiosis as;

a long-term biological and philosophical interaction between Humans and Nature that is mutualistic and obligate.

With three caveats: First, Nature, as it stands, does not need us to survive, but we need them to survive. Second, Nature already is in symbiosis with all their ecosystems, including us; it is us that needs to start reciprocating. Third, it is specifically those who participate in capitalistic values who need to reevaluate their relationship with Nature, as Indigenous Peoples all over the world have been living in symbiosis with Nature for millennia.

The pushback from the capitalist and many self-declared intellectuals is that destruction of Nature was ‘inevitable’ or the cost of “progress”. John Locke went further and proclaimed that the Land needed to be productive and create a capital gain (source). He was a key ‘scholar’ of the time and had a strong influence in how Land is viewed and valued to this day. Sadly, he did not understand that the Land was already productive; it was providing us with nourishment, medicine, shelter, and Life. It is John Locke’s line of thinking that has to be left behind, as, technically, it has never been valid. 

As a society we must really ponder what we mean by progress. Is it to simply generate wealth at any cost, including to the detriment of our own health? Epidemiologists have long studied the links between the consequences of maintaining progress (profit) on Human life; life becoming increasingly fast paced, the presentation of various environmental pollutants, the experience of psychosocial stressors of sustaining an economic standing, and the erosion of life supportive practices such as sleep, good nourishment, clean air ect. (source). Simultaneously, ecologists have looked at how progress (profit) impacts non Human Nature (source).

Progress is defined as forward movement towards a destination - we should therefore ask what is our desired destination ? 

 
 

PRINCIPLES OF MUTUALISTIC SYMBIOSIS

 

RELATED WORK

Previous
Previous

An ecological definition of health through the stress response

Next
Next

Nature is Healthcare