Air Pollution & Health in Southall, London
INTRODUCTION
In the following co-produced report with Clean Air for Southall & Hayes, we put gathering evidence to highlight the susceptibility of the Southall community and the need for stricter air pollution guidelines. Our research will explain why in our analysis the air pollution guidelines used by Public Health England (PHE) to advise the Southall Waterside development did not take into consideration the susceptibility of the Southall community.
“People who already experience chronic stress are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution. For example, children who already experience chronic stress show an increased risk of developing asthma when exposed to air pollution, even at low levels.”
Centric Lab has done a three month study on the phenomena of the Southall community. We were instructed pro-bono to investigate if Southall Waterside, a real estate development led by St. Williams Homes LLP, had a role to play in the self reported spikes in health issues in the residents near the site.
Public Health England (PHE) has reported that the site poses no health risk to the community at Southall due to air pollution levels being below the recommended guidelines and dissipation rate of the air pollutants. However, Centric Lab is putting forward a new perspective, which takes into consideration the biological make-up and susceptibility of the Southall community. Not every community has the same level of susceptibility to air pollution. This is due to each community’s unique physical and psychosocial stressor exposures. Physical stressors refer to tangible external stimuli e.g. chemical/biological agents, while psychosocial stressors refer to external demands that exceed an individual's perceived abilities and resources to adequately respond.
In the following report, we put gathering evidence to highlight the susceptibility of the Southall community and the need for stricter air pollution guidelines. Our research will explain why in our analysis the air pollution guidelines used by Public Health England (PHE) to advise the Southall Waterside development did not take into consideration the susceptibility of the Southall community. In turn, these guidelines could still cause a health risk despite abiding by World Health Organisation (WHO) air quality suggestions. Additionally, we will delineate how using population level data like the ones used by PHE is not granular enough to give a reliable health risk indication. This would mean the Southall Waterside development consortium will need to take stricter measures as the current levels of air pollution are a health risk, especially as clean air should always be a priority.
Finally, we will also suggest PHE to conduct a more rigorous cross-sectional study to understand how the air pollution from the site is affecting the health of Southall at an individual level.
* Please note that this report is being shared with the permission of the community. Therefore, if you are quoting their work, please contact them and let them know their experience is making a difference in the collective goal of lowering air pollution on communities.

Organisers from Clean Air for Southall & Hayes
Please fill out this form to download the report
RELATED WORK
Taking on an Ecological Justice approach to the NPPF requires a foundational shift to the role and motivations around planning and the relationship with land in the UK.
The purpose of the Environmental Data for Health Justice board is to build confidence in how those seeking structural health justice outcomes through research, campaigns, and other forms of advocacy use data as a language to directly address health injustices and develop strategies for health justice.
This project brought together people with knowledges across a variety of policy, organising in healthcare and the criminal justice system, as well as environmental and climate justice.
These are working principles set forth by a group of Indigenous Peoples and Land-Kinned Peoples who gathered in the UK. We see this both as a starting point and an evolving process. These principles are the first iteration, as they interact with more Peoples they will change and evolve.
Tribal law scholar, Grace Carson writes in the first person about restoring the Indigenous identities and cultures to Los Angeles, where it has been systemically erased.
The pathways to poor health outcomes for Indigenous Peoples are multifaceted and interconnected. Here, we provide a brief overview of the devastating effects of colonisation, forced assimilation, displacement, and systemic oppression have on health.
The purpose of this data led study is to bring attention to everyday people those who have the right to pollute in their neighbourhoods, so that people can make more informed decisions when it comes to voting and priorities for our shared health and climate change action points.
The intention of this audio project is to discuss the links between systems and imaginations rooted in supremacy, the dysregulation of planetary systems, and the poor health outcomes being experienced by peoples who are racialised and minoritised.
What is often missing from the conversation is how environmental hazards, due to being an experience of stress and trauma can lead to mental distress.
When people can no longer use their home to heal and feel that they are in a place of rest, they are at greater risk of not restoring. The home in the case of higher costs is no longer a healer but a harmer.
Regeneration is a word used to promote positive benefit from construction and urbanisation. However, construction on old gas works sites without biologically adequate provisions are putting various communities across the UK at high risk for poor health outcomes.
This project was created to showcase the lived experience of how colonisation has affected Indigenous Peoples in varied and unique ways, ripping some of us from Ancestral Lands, Peoples, and culture whilst others are currently fighting to keep their territories as colonisation continues to evolve.
Nature can be a site of freedom, and an opportunity to extend our ideas of Transness outside of just humans: what if the ocean is non-binary? What could it mean to relate our genders to elements in nature rather than social norms?
This project was created to showcase the lived experience and expertise of the various marginalised, working-class communities being affected by the dysregulation of our planetary systems (climate change).
Depression is recognised as ‘a major contributor to the overall global burden of disease’ and has both a complex aetiology and symptomatology. It is often framed as a mental health problem, however, the more we understand the more we uncover its physical symptomology.
A data-led article on the toxification of Land in the UK at the hands of industrialisation whilst the general public is shamed and gaslit for their systemic need to get into a motor vehicle. All the while, millions of tonnes of chemicals are churned out into the environment.
Simply saying Black or Indigenous Peoples experience Type 2 Diabetes at a higher rate, leaves room for further racialisation as it could add to the narrative of genetic determinism, which blames a person’s biological make-up for disease rather than considering ecological factors.
This open-letter is a list of our thoughts and concerns based from attending a public meeting held between Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council, Public Health England, Staffordshire County Council, the Environment Agency, and the community where Walleys Quarry Landfill site is located.
This document will look at how industry gaslights communities, the mistakes science makes, and the significance of listening and acknowledging the lived experience. This report is for both practitioners and citizens who are experiencing environmental and health injustice.
We propose that to stop urban inequity our understanding of what regeneration means needs to evolve from one that is capital driven and spatially focused, to one that is health driven actively targeting the environmental, social, and governance barriers to health.
This report will focus primarily on the role of the built environment because practitioners have a significant influence on the ability of citizens to build healthy relationships between health and place.
In this essay, we will be detailing the pathways of oppression, including the role that science, policy, and city organisers play.
A stressor is defined as a novel threatening environmental agent that alters the baseline human biological system in either of two ways: bringing the system to an unstable biological state, or slowing down the system’s internal response so that it cannot reach equilibrium.
In the context of Covid-19, air pollution presents a particularly insidious hazard given that the disease affects respiratory and cardio-vascular systems.
There are various problems with targeting a community based on their race, specifically in the context of health. To say “Black community” or “Indigenous Community” is a misnomer as it doesn’t see the person to place relationship, which is essential to understanding health.
In any given area, there will be people who are suffering greatly from the consequences of air pollution whilst others may not see any consequences. This phenomenon is worth understanding, rather than dismissing it as not statistically significant.
This paper looks to approach the inequitable prevalence of COVID-19 from a biological perspective, drawing a clear throughline between human health and urban environments. Specifically, its relation to COVID-19 in BAME communities of London.
This report is the result of a co-designed and produced community-led scientific study highlighting the susceptibility of the Southall community and the need for stricter air pollution guidelines.
PTSD is growing in urban environments and its prevalence is disproportionately higher within impoverished neighbourhoods. Our research question is: are some urban environments so inadequate they can cause physical and psychological trauma?
This paper sets out Centric Lab’s responses to questions and policy changes proposed changes to the National Planning Policy Framework on 30 July 2024. It included questions and proposed changes on a number of topics, which have implications for people’s health and wellbeing.